Bibliometrics refers to the quantitative measures used to assess research output, in other words, publication and citation data analysis. Citation analysis is based on the premise that if an academic shows good citation metrics, it is very likely that he or she has made a significant impact on the field. However, it is important to note that the reverse is not necessarily true. If an academic shows weak citation metrics, that researcher may be publishing:
The three main tools for performing a citation analysis are Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar/Publish or Perish.
When undertaking a Citation Analysis it is important to be aware of the following points.
The Web of Science is one of the main citation databases used to conduct citation analyses (see the library's list of databases). The Web of Science includes:
To view selection criteria and to request the inclusion of a journal title in Web of Science click here.
In addition, the Web of Science also includes conference papers and books via the Conference Proceedings Citation Index and Book Citation Index.
Further information on Web of Science including tutorials and guides can be found at https://clarivate.libguides.com/woscc.
For help on doing a citation analysis in Web of Science (including an explanation of the h-index) see this video tutorial.
This tutorial will show you how to use Web of Science to find journals that may be relevant to your research topic.
The h-index is intended to reflect ongoing impact. A h-index of x for an author signifies that the author has published x papers each of which has been cited at least x times. It is a commonly used indicator of research output which reflects both the number of publications and the distribution of citations to those publications.
A h-index of 5 for an author signifies that the author has published 5 papers each of which has been cited at least 5 times. A h index can be created for a single author or a research unit. It is important to remember that the index is only useful in comparing scientists at the same career stage and working within the same field as citation conventions differ substantially between disciplines.
Alternative metrics or altmetrics “is the creation and study of new metrics based on the Social Web for analyzing, and informing scholarship.” Altmetrics include article downloads and views, bookmarks, saves, favourites, readers, blog posts, tweets, Wikipedia articles, news stories, likes, shares and ratings. Altmetrics provides impact of just-published work and includes all types of scholarly output.
Publish or Perish is a citation analysis tool developed by Dr. Anne-Wil Harzing of the University of Melbourne which uses Google Scholar citation data. It is free for personal non-profit use and can be installed from http://www.harzing.com/pop.htm.
Google Scholar covers more books, theses, conference papers, technical reports and other academic publications than either Web of Science or Scopus. However, coverage in Google Scholar is uncontrolled and there is no definitive list of all publications that are included.
Citation analysis results from Publish or Perish favour those who have personally made their articles available online, for example through institutional or subject repositories.
To do a citation analysis using Publish or Perish see this video tutorial from Purdue University Libraries.